Chapter 9: Building Support for the
Proposed Change
This chapter outlines the necessary steps in building support for
proposed change. The tables in this
chapter are very helpful in providing succinct examples of the
terminology.
STEP 1: DEVELOP A WORKING HYPOTHESIS.
Develop a working hypothesis that is agreed upon by the stakeholders, is
research-based, and is not merely based on your own intuition or biases. The working hypothesis should be succinct,
determining the most significant factors leading to the need for change in
causal (if-then) statements.
STEP 2: SEEK OUT STAKEHOLDERS. Seek
out stakeholders with diverse perspectives to implement change. These include the initiators, change agents,
clients, support system, controlling system, host and implementing system,
target system, and action system.
·
The persons who first recognized the problem are
called the initiators.
·
The persons that will lead/coordinate activities
are the change agents. They tend to be the same people as the
initiators. Utilizing change agents may
require formal or informal approval from higher authority for them to dedicate
time to the activity.
·
Clients,
which can be the primary or secondary beneficiaries of the change, may or may
not be different from the target population.
·
Support
systems are individuals, groups and other entities within the community
that support change efforts.
·
Controlling
systems are persons that formally have the authority to approve change
efforts. They may or may not be persons
at the highest level of authority.
·
Host and
implementing systems is the designated unit responsible for carrying out
change efforts. They are usually located
below the controlling system within an organizational chart.
The book emphasizes that each of these stakeholders’ position and
perspective about change efforts may differ from each other.
·
The target
system is the entit(ies) that need to be changed to achieve the desired
benefits. You also need to determine
where it is located and if there are multiple targets.
·
Lastly, the action
system consists of persons who have an active role in planning and
implementing change. Ideally they should
include as many individuals from the other systems as possible.
THE IMPORTANCE OF DEFINING ROLES IN THIS MANNER IS TO UNDERSTAND THE
POWER DYNAMICS OF EACH ROLE AND THAT EACH ROLE, RESPONSIBILITES AND
EXPECTATIONS ARE CLEAR AND DISTINCT.
Are
you able to identify any stakeholders within your community?
STEP 3: EXAMINE THE COMMUNITY’S
WILLINGNESS FOR CHANGE. This can be
determined in at least three ways. Firstly,
investigating its previous commitments to other initiatives can predict how the
community may react to the proposed change.
Also, if the community initially shows enthusiasm, commitment, and
cohesiveness in the early stages of the proposed change, more likely will the
change be implemented. Secondly, the availability of resources is instrumental
in determining how change occurs.
Therefore, it’s important to conduct an inventory of resources available
and compare this to what resources are needed.
Thirdly, the researcher and stakeholders need to identify how to deal
with opposition, conflict, and weaknesses in their overall strategies.
STEP 4: SELECT A CHANGE APPROACH.
Approaches can be a policy, a program, a project, personnel, or
practice. Table 9.5 on page 327 provides
a brief definition of these change approaches.
These approaches are not mutually exclusive; you may find that
incorporating multiple approaches may be more valuable.
Tao, I found it to be very helpful how you broke up the sections of your summary. Nicely done and well summarized. Two stakeholders in my community are Dr. Eric Knost, superintendent of Mehlville School District and Dr. Jim Simpson, superintendent of Lindbergh School District. I live in the middle of both districts.
ReplyDeleteI like how you broke it down into the two steps and used bullet points. It was easy to read. I really don't know much about the community where I live in O'Fallon, Missouri. I am not from St. Louis and I am learning a lot of information about the area in this class! I researched stakeholders in my community and found that Bill Hennessy is the mayor. The planning and development director is David Woods. Marsha Seymour plans the festivals, such as the Heritage and Freedom Festival.
ReplyDeleteExcellent summary, Tayo. For me, this was a good chapter to have read this week. The tables were particularly helpful! One of the U. City stakeholders, who we are actually seeing tonight and I am interviewing tomorrow, is Joylynn Pruitt, superintendent of the U. City school district.
ReplyDeleteThis is a perfect "Cliffnotes" version of Chapter 9, well done! This chapter was extremely relevant to have read before our discussion with Joy and Angela yesterday. You can gather the information, data, identify the various stakeholders in the community, but when it comes down to it, the community's desire/willingness for change takes the cake. This makes me think of the after-school clubs that Washington University wanted to implement at certain U-City schools (the entrepreneur, future engineers, and nutrition/gardening clubs), and how they ultimately failed because the students had no interest in them. Seeking out what the community wants/needs is the most important part of the process.
ReplyDeleteGreat summary! Easy to read and not too long. It was helpful to put the information into your own terms to better relate to the material. Thanks!
ReplyDelete