Ch. 9 –
“Building Support for the Proposed Change” - Reading Blog
This
chapter from “Social Work Macro Practice” focuses on how to establish support for
macro-level change. It touches on how to formulate an idea for community-level
change, and how best to gather concerned individuals in order to make this idea
into a reality. Making changes and initiating programs that affect larger
groups involves serious support and participation, and the skills and ideas put
forth in the chapter are thorough in teaching students how to create
significant changes.
A macro-level change that is in the
works in the Jeff VanderLou right now is the proposed Northside Development
Project. Reviewing this chapter, I found myself comparing the strategies
outlined here with the steps that Paul McKee and McEagle Properties have
implemented. There are a few similarities with the text’s ideas about building
support and McKee’s approach to doing so whilst planning for the development,
but unfortunately, these are far outnumbered by the differences. The reading heavily
stresses how necessary it is for community residents to be part of the
decision-making process. To some, such as myself, this seems to be common
sense, but it was an idea McKee initially overlooked. He began buying
properties around the JVL neighborhood, as well as neighboring sections of
North city, without publicly stating any of his plans. It wasn’t until he had
already bought up a large amount of local properties that his identity, and
later, his motives, were revealed to the public.
Following this disclosure, McKee
held a community meeting, where residents were understandably upset regarding
his company’s purchases and overall lack of transparency. Did his company
reasonably believe that they were going to continue this project without
bringing it up to North St. Louis residents? At what point would they have made
their plans public? Would they ever have allowed community members to have a
say? The reading mentions the importance of support systems in making changes,
and there are certainly some majorly influential individuals and groups on the
side of the development, mainly being parties that stand to profit;
contractors, businesses that may move in, other developers, etc. But it seems
that the community support at that meaning, which took place in 2009, was
predictably lacking. This lack of support continues to the present day as McKee
still fights to obtain funding for his enormous project, which he has invested vast
amounts of his own funds into. It seems to me that one thing that can be common
sense to some can easily be overlooked and/or disregarded by others, especially
when there are huge sums of money at play.
In my opinion, Mr. McKee is a businessman first, on a money mission. According to the chapter, there are good systems in place, but the key is always inclusion of the community, and he failed to effectively do that.
ReplyDeleteWhat is interesting to me is that he can't get the public trust back. He failed in the beginning, and now I think no matter what he says or does, no one can trust him.
ReplyDeleteIt reminds me, though, of Walt Disney's land grab in Florida. He bought through shell corporations because if word had gotten out that Disney was buying up land, prices would have been driven up. The biggest difference though is that Disney was buying swamps and orange groves, and McKee is in the middle of the city, buying homes.
I guess my point is that if he ends up doing good in the community, will all be forgiven, or will people still dislike him?
(Another point could be that I don't know how people who lived near Orlando felt about their town and way of life being changed so dramatically. Maybe if you talk to natives, you'd find that Disney is still hated...)
Jeri, that is a really interesting comparison, I had no idea Disney had acquired their land in Florida like that. It does sound very much like Mr. McKee's dubious ethics. And compared to other business dealings of Disney's that I have heard about, it makes sense.
DeleteThankfully, there is a just released movie that takes place inside Disneyland and was filmed completely WITHOUT the company's permission. It's apparently a psychological-horror movie about a dad who goes there with his family and ends up going insane, with lots of bizarre things happening. http://escapefromtomorrow.com (warning: adult themes)
So we can stick it to Disney by supporting the movie, and if anyone has any ideas about how to stick it to Mr. McKee, I am all (mouse) ears.
Dan, I thought it was a great that you brought a real-life example of JVL to your summary about change at the macro-level. I agree with Adrienne with the fact that McKee seems like he is out to make a buck as his first priority. Unfortunately, he didn't see the involvement of the community's residents until it was too late. Jeri noted an important fact and that is he can't get the public trust back.
ReplyDelete