“Russian
Youth Group With a Mission: Sniffing Out Illegal Migrants” by Andrew Roth –
Blog Response
This
article, taken from the September 3, 2013 issue of the New York Times, descries
a vigilante group in Russia that aids the government in their crackdown on illegal
immigration. The article is quite bleak, as the group, ‘Moscow Shield’,
represents the ongoing suppression of human rights that is commonplace in modern
Russia. Moscow Shield consists of young men and women who seek out migrant
workers, whom they feel do not belong in their community. Once they locate the
migrants, the group contacts the police, and then detains the migrants until
the police arrive.
The
Russian government’s recent quelling of social justice first came to national
attention in the U.S. following the legal action taken against the human rights
activism group Pussy Riot. Pussy Riot was taken to court over its public
displays of anti-government and anti-religious beliefs. They have since gained
notoriety around the world, but several of its members have been imprisoned,
and its future put in doubt. On top of this, Russia’s opposition to gay rights
has made headlines of late, as some countries have hinted at withdrawing from
the February 2014 Winter Olympics due to the government’s anti-homosexuality
stance. Such an action would be bold, as the Olympics represent global
togetherness and athletic achievement, and such a lack of involvement would
leave an asterisk serving as a longstanding reminder of the matter. In the wake
of this situation there has been an increase in violent attacks on homosexuals
in Russia, and just within the past week, a seemingly archaic law was passed
that forbids the mention of homosexuality around a minor.
There are many challenging issues within
this article. A major concern that Mr. Roth brings up is, where do you draw the
line in how civilians and the government coexist regarding the enforcement of
law? This relates directly to our studies regarding communities, as one of the
main tenets of community is the rule of law. When the rule of law seems
tenuous, a community is put in a difficult position. The KKK became a major
vigilante force for “white power” in the South for many years, which included
coordinating with local police forces. In Nazi Germany, the hatred of Jews and
other “undesirables”, which was backed by local authorities and eventually
became part of Hitler’s main platform, was a major part of the lead-up to WWII
and the Holocaust. A much closer parallel is with the unsanctioned individuals
and groups that patrol the U.S. – Mexico border with the hopes of stopping
illegal border crossings. These people are doing what they feel is best for the
country. However, they are taking a very heavy subject, illegal immigration,
within their own hands, and seemingly doing so without concern of the
complexity of the matter. Moscow Shield is doing an identical task, also with
what they believe to be the best of intentions.
“We are
not there to beat them or punish them. We are there to achieve justice.” This
quote from a member of Moscow Shield, who most likely does not recognize the
weight of such words, shows the naivety of the group’s actions. For many of
these migrants, who live in substandard conditions, work unfavorable jobs, and
risk constant harassment, all for the hope of a better life for them and their
offspring, this “justice” is clearly a punishment.
When government encourages this brand of "justice", people are further divided and their voice weakened. With the political landscape these days, I am worried whether these extreme strikes against human rights are acts of desperation by a government barely clinging to power or carefully calculated maneuvers.
ReplyDelete"just within the past week, a seemingly archaic law was passed that forbids the mention of homosexuality around a minor."
ReplyDeletewow.... that is all.... wow
Looking at the rest of your blog, what is described in paragraphs 3 and 4 is the "slippery slope". It seems as though the vigilante groups are doing something that's not really THAT bad, but where does it stop? The people ARE here illegally, but my compassion says if they are working and not causing any problems, why not look the other way? What I am saying is that I get upholding the law, but I also want to help people.
A good friend of my daughter's is the the daughter of illegals. If her parents and older brother get caught, she has the responsibility of raising the four younger sisters. She just turned nineteen. I can't imagine how she concentrates on college, knowing that at any time it could all be taken away.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/home-schooling-german-family-fights-deportation/story?id=18842383
German families are not allowed to homeschool, so the above family emigrated to the US. I'm not sure of the resolution of the case, but it was brought to mind by this one.
http://www.hslda.org/hs/international/Germany/201308300.asp
The children were taken from their parents simply because they homeschool. Everywhere you look, no one is able to just live and let live.
Nothing about this is suprising to me about this article. I think back on what Russia supposedly used to be when I was a small child and much of the evening news was spent telling us how bad and evil Russia was. Well somethings never change and it is clear that Russia is still what I have always thought is was. It would be very scary to live in an environment where I would have to be afraid of being taken hostage because I was not exactly like those who are preying on me.
ReplyDeleteGod bless America...and I'm not very patriotic
ReplyDelete